top of page

Court Martial of Charles Butler

Charles Butler was a Private in Company "A" of the 102nd Regiment of the United States Colored Troops. In the early morning hours of July 3rd, 1864, Private Butler was found supposedly sleeping on his post. In his Court Martial, Butler, was charged with Sleeping on Post, along with Disobedience of Orders, Conduct to the prejudice of good order and Military Discipline, and Disrespect to his Superior Officer. Butler was first accused of falling asleep while sitting in a Sentry Box while on post. Through the testimony of Sergeant Newsom (Nusum) it was shown that Butler was not in the Sentry Box as first accused. He was actually sitting on a stone at his Post. Through the testimony of others involved with the case, including 2nd Lieutenant Caleb Griffith, Butler was not charged with sleeping on Post, but was found guilty of the other three charges  due to his behavior following the incident on July 3rd, 1864. Butler was sentenced to two months hard labor at Fort Stevens. It appears that Butler's sentence was actually shortened since he had already been confined for a period of 5 months while awaiting his Court Martial. To view a full transcript of the Court Martial, please click the button below 

To view original Court Martial documents in their full size, please click on the image above

Charges and Specifications

 

 

Charge First    -    Sleeping on Post.

Specification   -   IN this, that Private Charles

Butler Company “A” 102nd U.S.C. Troops having

been duly posted as a Sentinel, was found

asleep on his Post between the hours of 12

M (midnight) and 1 A.M. when visited

by the Corporal of the Guard – This at

Beaufort S.C. on or about the 3rd day of

July 1864

Charge Second     -   Disobedience of Orders

Specifications First   -  In this that Private Charles

Butler Company “A” 102nd U.S.C. Troops, having

been ordered by his Superior Officer Captain

C.S. Montague 102nd Regt U.S.C. Troops, not to

sit down while on Post, did seat himself

in a Sentry Box after having been duly

posted as a sentinel and was thus

found when visited by the Corporal

of the Guard. This at Beaufort S.C. on or

about the 3rd day of July 1864

Specification Second    -   In this that Private

 

[Charles Butler Company “A” 102d U.S.C Troops

having been ordered by his Superior Officer

Captain C.S. Montague 102nd Regt. U.S.C.T

to call the number of his Post, and the

hour of the night while on Post did

after having been duly posted as a

Sentinel neglect to give such call at

12 M(midnight). This at Beaufort S.C. on or

about the 3rd day of July 1864.

Charge Third    -   Conduct to the prejudice  

of good order and Military Discipline

Specification    -    In this, that Private

Charles Butler Company “A” 102nd Regt. U.S.C.T.

after having been relieved from his post

by the Corporal of the Guard for neglect

of duty and sleeping on Post did make

use of the following language to other

members of the Guard to wit: _ I think

these non commissioned Officers are putting

on a damned sight of style or words to

to that effect. This at Beaufort S.C.

  

on or about the 3rd day of July 1864.

Charge Fourth    -   Disrespect to his Superior

Officer

Specification    –    In this that Private Charles

Butler Company “A” 102nd Regt. U.S.C. Troops, having

been ordered into Confinement by his Com-

manding Officer Captain C.S. Montague 102nd

Regt. U.S.C.T (said Captain being at the time

in Command of the Guard) with instructions

if he should offer any resistance that he

should be handcuffed did reply to the

said Captain C.S. Montague in a disres-

pectful manner in the following word; to

wit; “I’ll never let any man do that

Captain” or words to that effect, referring

to the putting on of handcuffs – This at

Beaufort S.C. on or about the 3rd day

of July 1864.

​

DSC_0578crop.jpg
DSC_0580crop.jpg
DSC_0581crop.jpg

Second Lieutenant Caleb Griffith Company “F”

102nd U.S.C. Troops, a witness for the prosecution

being duly sworn testified as follows.

                      (Partial Testimony)

​

 

"He as, well as all other were instructed

on that day by Captain Montague and

myself to call the hours of the night

after 9 or ten o’clock. I think it was

after ten beginning at Post No. 1 at the

Guard House Beaufort, and continued from

post to post in rotation. No 2 following

No.1 I think that was the custom at

that time. No 2 was about thirty rods from

No.1 No 3 about 25 rods from No. 2 –

No 2 was at General Saxtons quarters. The

Accused was posted, I think, at No 2, I

know I made the rounds and went to

the Post of the Accused about 25 or 30

minutes before the Accused was brought in

by the Corporal, to the Guard House. When

I then saw him the Accused was awake

and doing his duty. He challenged me

when I approached. He was standing up

on the side walk. He was not in the

Sentry Box. It was quite a light, clear

​

 

night. The moon was not shining. I was

about 3 rods from the Accused when he

challenged me. I was considerably surprised

when I saw the Accused brought in by the

Corporal for sleeping on Post. I thought it

was queer that he could get to sleep so

quick. The wind did not blow at all

that night. It was clam quiet. This was

about 1 or 2 o’clock in the morning of the

2nd July 1864. The Accused did not offer

any resistance either before or after the

matter of handcuffing was raised. There

was no seat that I knew of in the

Sentry Box at Post No.2 that I took any

notice of at that time. I am not aware

that the Accused has any defect in his

hearing. I never heard him complain of

any. At the time the Accused was brought

to the Guard House by the Corporal, Captain

Montague was still in Command of the

Guard."

DSC_0592crop.jpg
DSC_0593crop.jpg

Sergeant Edward Nusum Company “H” 102nd

U.S.C. Troops a Witness for the prosecution,

being duly sworn, testified as follows. (Partial Testimony)

​

My Company was at Beaufort doing

Guard duty. We went on in the morning

I could not tell you the day. We came

off next morning between 8 and 9 o’clock

The Accused Charles Butler was a member

of the Guard that day. I was at that

time a Corporal. My duty was to post

the relief. The Accused belonged to

my Relief. Captain Montague who was

Officer of the Guard was in Command

of the Guard, and I was Corporal of the
Guard. Captain Montague ordered me to

post the relief. I posted the Accused that

night about 10 o’clock on Post No 2, just

the side of the Magnolia Hotel by

those Flag stones, some Officers stayed there.

I had given orders to the Accused, and so

did Captain Montague that day, not to sit

down on Post. I went up to the post

of the Accused Post No 2. I cannot tell the

 

 

exact time, it was after I put him on

about three quarters of an hour or so. At

that time the Accused was standing up

doing his duty. He challenged me. I

did not visit him gain till the call

(repeating the hour of the night) twelve

o’clock was made. Captain Montague sent

me then. It was after the Sentinel at

Post No 1 had called the hour of the

night, twelve o’clock. He repeated it

three distinct times, but No 2 did not call

at all. When I came up to Post No 2

nobody challenged me. I saw the

Accused sitting on a stone at his Post.

It was not in the Sentry Box. The Sentry

Box was right opposite to it. I found the

Accused with his musket forward between his legs.

and his head leaning forward. Nobody

was with and except the Accused. I spoke

to him twice before he answered me, asking

him why he did not repeat the hour

 

 

of the night. He kind a hemmed and

harred around, but did not get up yet,

and said he thought some one was

calling for the Corporal of the Guard.

I told him he mus’nt go to sleep on his

Post. He said he wasn’t sleeping He kind

a’ laughed. He got up from the stone and

I left him and reported him to Captain

Montague who ordered me to take another

man, and to go and relieve him. When

I came back to relive him he was doing

his duty. He did not give any excuse

for sitting down as he was. He didn’t

say anything at all. When I came up

to the accused, and found him, as I

thought asleep I did not shake him or

touch him. I only called to him. At that

time I could not see his face. He had

his head down.

DSC_0594crop.jpg
DSC_0595crop.jpg
DSC_0596crop.jpg
DSC_0597crop.jpg

The Findings of the Court

 

The Court was then cleared for deliberat-

tion, and having maturely considered the

evidence adduced, find the Accused Private

Charles Butler Company “A” 102nd Regiment

U.S.C. Troops as follows

Of the First Specification of First Charge   -   "Not Guilty"

 

​

 

Of the First Charge   -    “Not Guilty”

 

Of the First Specification of Second Charge    -    “Guilty”except the word “in a Sentry Box”

 

Of the Second Specification of Second Charge   -   “Guilty”

 

Of the Second Charge   -   “Guilty"

 

Of the Specification of Third Charge 

“Guilty”

 

Of the Third Charge   -   “Guilty”

 

Of the Specifications of Fourth Charge

“Guilty”

 

Of the Fourth Charge   -   “Guilty”

DSC_0611crop.jpg
DSC_0612crop.jpg

“B”

Statement of the prisoner Charles Butler

​

​

The only thing I was guilty of was sitting

down on post. I have been in jail for six

months under this arrest, without getting

any pay. My mother has six children and

no one to take care of them but myself

I have not drawn any clothes since my arrest and my mo-

ther wrote me that if I did not send her

some money, she could not pay her taxes

and would lose her house. I was one of

the first men in the Regiment. Only eight

belonged to when I joined.

                     Charles (His mark) Butler

Witness – G.F. Eaton

           2nd Lieut Co “K” 127th N.Y. Vols

DSC_0618crop.jpg
bottom of page